ஐ.எஸ்.எஸ்.என்: 2155-6148
Pasechnik IN, Skobelev EI, Lesina SV and Kurochkin MS
Introduction: In this article we analyze the use of the METI (Medical Education Technology Inc.) Human Patient Simulator (HPS) for the training of first-year anesthesiology residents in providing general inhalation anesthesia. The aim of this study was to compare simulation-based training on the METI HPS with traditional clinical-based training.
Methods: In this research were included 28 first-year anesthesiology residents which were randomly assigned to either traditional clinical-based (group A) or simulation-based (group B) training. The study consisted of two stages: the training stage (1) and the evaluation stage (2). On the 1st stage residents from both groups were passing through clinical-based and simulation-plus-clinical-based courses, respectively. After a number of giving anesthesia the residents participated in, the competent mentors decided whether they were ready to step to the evaluation stage. On the 2nd stage each of the participants had to provide general anesthesia on his/her own on the METI HPS. During all parts all participants were supervised by highly-qualified specialist. The results of the study were statistically processed by using a two-sample Student t-test.
Results: We found a statistically significant difference in the duration of the training stage between the two groups of participants. Residents from clinical-based group (group A) took part in 15,08 ± 1,83 anesthesia before they were allowed to proceed to the evaluation stage of the study. Residents from simulation-based group (group B) required only 7,27 ± 1,19 anesthesia for the same purpose.
In the evaluation stage there was a difference in average rating between the two groups. Group A scored 40,08 ± 2,57 out of 100 points, whereas group B got 70,55 ± 7,1 points, which is also a significant difference in terms of statistics (p<0,05).
Conclusions: The obtained data allow considering simulation training of residents with combined methods of anesthesia at the METI HPS. more effective.